I and seen abstract resemblances within Filipino size having social positions and effects and many off Goldberg’s (1982) conceptually-derived classes getting personal positions, relationships, and you will consequences throughout the English vocabulary. Specifically, Filipino Prominence generally seems to encompass terms in Goldberg’s Glory, Determine, Prominence, and you may Affluence classes. Filipino Uselessness (inversely) is much like Goldberg’s Skills classification. Romantic abstract correspondences also are visible ranging from Filipino Attractiveness and you may Goldberg’s Attractiveness, and you will ranging from Filipino Respectability and you will Goldberg’s Admiration. Filipino Charm generally seems to cover a lot of Goldberg’s Attract, Charm, and you may Enjoyment-well worth groups, and lots of terms and conditions in the Goldberg’s Attract classification in addition to convergence that have Filipino Individuality. Filipino Dangerousness is much like Goldberg’s Popularity, Fearsomeness, and you will Antagonism categories, and you can Filipino Destructiveness along with overlaps that have Goldberg’s Antagonism. Not surprisingly, two Filipino size which can be discussed primarily by real attribute conditions, Power and you can Presentableness, don’t seem to coincide closely to almost any off Goldberg’s classes out of social roles and you may consequences (regardless if Goldberg’s Manner group has “presentable” once the an expression). We need to note that i failed https://datingmentor.org/pl/dating-for-seniors-recenzja/ to make an effort to build marker balances getting Goldberg’s (1982) conceptual groups and their notice-declaration structure in the English words are not familiar. Complete, yet not, the conceptual assessment implies that there is a great deal of cross-social resemblance from the major types of social roles and you may outcomes, and that some of Goldberg’s alot more subdued conceptual groups might mix into the greater proportions during the thinking-report data.
Enough Goldberg’s less classes, together with Nurturance, Succorance, Modifications, Clarity, Liability, Forgivability, Fashion, Government, Gender, and you may Religion do not display much conceptual resemblance to the Filipino size of social and you may real functions
Playing with joint component and regression analyses, i showed that all of the public and you will bodily feature dimensions was basically meagerly to highly relevant to no less than one Filipino feature and evaluative size. The new clearest difference is actually the small Presentableness dimension. In spite of the character-significance judgments of our own Filipino informants, the new Presentableness dimensions, that was made up of appearance attributes (e.grams., presentable, clean against. dirty), may provide less information about personality compared to most other personal and you will physical characteristic proportions. Likewise, the latest Prominence and you can Attractiveness proportions-over additional social and you can real attribute size-apparently target attributes that will be quite line of conceptually from the Filipino attribute and you may evaluative proportions.
The correlations found between all personal proportions in addition to feature attribute dimensions recommend that terms and conditions having social opportunities, statuses, and you will consequences get echo societal outcomes of version of character traits. In fact, Angleitner mais aussi al. (1990) ideal you to public positions and you will statuses echo the newest impact one traits enjoys into the other people. Such as for instance, Filipinos who’ve Gregariousness attributes are usually discussed by the on their own while others in terms of the social characteristics define this new Charm dimension (e.g., factors delight or pleasure). Similarly, Filipinos that Conscientiousness faculties are likely to be described for the regards to Respectability social characteristics (elizabeth.grams., reputable, honorable). These you can easily links ranging from attributes and you will social reputations might possibly be checked in direct coming search because of the correlating care about-reviews for the feature dimensions having observer reviews towards the personal and you will actual characteristic proportions.
In particular, because of the dating out-of worry about-observed appeal so you’re able to subjective really-being (Diener, Wolsic, & Fujita, 1995), and body photo so you’re able to one another notice-respect and you can restaurants conditions (Mintz & Betz, 1988), this new Appeal dimensions you can expect to promote an important introduction into the health-related investigations
A practiced implication of our own performance would be the fact not very much would be missing because of the evaluating just the Filipino feature and you may evaluative size. In fact, given the results of the combined role analysis ( Table 2 ), certain terms having personal and you may physical qualities can also be extra so you can present feature and you may evaluative balances. not, if one would be to add even more proportions, not in the feature and you will evaluative proportions, the best candidates might be Prominence and you can Attractiveness. The brand new Stature scale carry out determine care about-sensed social standing or condition, because Appeal size create assess worry about-identified real appeal and charm.
